Highlights
- •Median time-to-(being)-ulcer-free in 4,709 DFU patients was 112 days and 68.4% were ulcer-free within two years.
- •Each year younger than 60 years was independently associated with longer time-to-ulcer-free.
- •PAD and ulcer size were associated with longer time-to-ulcer-free but only for 6 months.
- •Podiatry and knee-high offloading treatment were associated shorter time-to-ulcer-free.
- •Probability of being ulcer-free was largest for geographical remoteness and PAD factors.
Abstract
Aims
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
Abbreviations:
DFU (diabetes-related foot ulcer), PAD (peripheral artery disease), QHRFF (Queensland High Risk Foot Form), HR (hazard ratio), IQR (interquartile range), CI (confidence interval)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeReferences
- Global Disability Burdens of Diabetes-Related Lower-Extremity Complications in 1990 and 2016.Diabetes Care. 2020; 43: 964-974https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1614
- Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 2367-2375
- Incidence and risk factors for developing infection in patients presenting with uninfected diabetic foot ulcers.PLoS ONE. 2017; 12: e0177916
- Predictors of Lower-Extremity Amputation in Patients With an Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcer.Diabetes Care. 2015; 38: 852-857https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1598
- The silent overall burden of foot disease in a representative hospitalised population.Int Wound J. 2016; 14: 716-728https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12683
- Diabetes-related lower-extremity complications are a leading cause of the global burden of disability.Diabet Med. 2018; 35: 1297-1299https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13680
- The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England.Diabet Med. 2019; 36: 995-1002https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13973
- Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease.The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia. 2008; 51: 747-755
- Diabetic foot disease: impact of ulcer location on ulcer healing.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013; 29: 377-383https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2400
- High probability of healing without amputation of plantar forefoot ulcers in patients with diabetes.Wound Repair Regen. 2015; 23: 922-931
National Diabetes Foot Care Audit (2019) National Diabetes Foot Care Audit Fourth Annual Report. Available from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/national-diabetes-footcare-audit/2014-2018. Accessed 9 May 2021.
- Diabetic foot ulcer classifications: A critical review.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3272
- Scottish foot ulcer risk score predicts foot ulcer healing in a regional specialist foot clinic.Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 2064-2069
- Assessing the outcome of the management of diabetic foot ulcers using ulcer-related and person-related measures.Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 1784-1787https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-0306
- Pilot study to assess measures to be used in the prospective audit of the management of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Diabet Med. 2015; 32: 78-84
- Diabetic foot ulcer management in a multidisciplinary foot centre: one-year healing, amputation and mortality rate.Journal of Wound Care. 2020; 29: 464-471
- Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study.Diabetologia. 2009; 52: 398-407https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1226-2
- A Predictive Model for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcome: The Wound Healing Index.Advances in Wound Care. 2016; 5: 279-287https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0668
- A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective analysis of 1,000 patients.Diabetes Care. 2006; 29: 988-992
- The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age, sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.Diabet Med. 2001; 18: 133-138https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00422.x
- Diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: the association of wound size, wound duration, and wound grade on healing.Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1835-1839https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.10.1835
- Ulcer-free survival days and ulcer healing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective cohort study.Int Wound J. 2019; 16: 1365-1372https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13199
- Reporting standards of studies and papers on the prevention and management of foot ulcers in diabetes: required details and markers of good quality.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 4: 781-788https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(16)30012-2
- Factors associated with healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers: observations from a large prospective real-world cohort.Diabetes Care. 2021; 44: e143-e145https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-3120
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies.PLoS Med. 2007; 18: 800-804
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Data by region, 2013-18. Available from https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/1410.0Main+Features12013-18?OpenDocument. Accessed March 1 2020.
National Diabetes Service Scheme (2019) The Australian diabetes map. Available from https://map.ndss.com.au/. Accessed 1 May 2020.
- Definitions and criteria for diabetic foot disease.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3268
- Validation of a Diabetic Wound Classification System: The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation.Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 855-859https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.5.855
- The Queensland high risk foot form (QHRFF)–is it a reliable and valid clinical research tool for foot disease?.Journal of foot and ankle research. 2014; 7https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-7
- Queensland High Risk Foot Form Guideline: Statewide Diabetic Foot Working Group.in: Network S.D.C. Brisbane. Australia, 2011
- Reduced Incidence of Foot-Related Hospitalisation and Amputation amongst Persons with Diabetes in Queensland, Australia.PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0130609https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130609
- Further Development of Flexible Parametric Models for Survival Analysis.the Stata Journal. 2009; 9: 265-290https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900206
- Temporal Trends in Incident Hospitalization for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcer in Type 2 Diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study.Diabetes Care. 2021; 44: 722-730https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1743
- Development of a prediction model for foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes using easy-to-obtain clinical variables.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021; 9: e002257https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002257
- Association between race/ethnicity and the risk of amputation of lower extremities among medicare beneficiaries with diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot infections.BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 2020; 8e001328https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001328
- The impact of a podiatric lead limb preservation team on disease outcomes and risk prediction in the diabetic lower extremity: a retrospective cohort study.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010; 100: 235-241https://doi.org/10.7547/1000235
- Effect of contact with podiatry in a team approach context on diabetic foot ulcer and lower extremity amputation: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2020; 13https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-0380-8
- The association between baseline characteristics and the outcome of foot lesions in a UK population with diabetes.Diabet Med. 2007; 24: 977-981https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02189.x
- Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3276
- A flexible parametric approach to examining spatial variation in relative survival.Stat Med. 2016; 35: 5448-5463https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7071
- Regional variations in amputation rates: are regional diabetic foot services the reason?.ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2019; 89: 796-797https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15161
- Location, location, location: Geographic clustering of lower-extremity amputation among medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 2363-2367https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0807
- Rural chronic disease research patterns in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand: a systematic integrative review.BMC public health. 2020; 20: 7https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08912-1
- Associations of health literacy with diabetic foot outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabet Med. 2018; 35: 1470-1479https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13694
- Effectiveness of offloading interventions to heal foot ulcers in persons with diabetes: a systematic review.Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3275
- Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3274
- Measuring Plantar Tissue Stress in People With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Critical Concept in Diabetic Foot Management.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019; 13: 869-880https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819849092
- Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Diabetic Foot Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018; 17: 247-257https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734618809583
- Review of the role of cigarette smoking in diabetic foot.J Diabetes Investig. 2019; 10: 202-215https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12952
- Managing diabetic foot infections: a survey of Australasian infectious diseases clinicians.Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 2018; 11https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0256-3
Fernando ME, Seneviratne RM, Tan YM, et al. (2016) Intensive versus conventional glycaemic control for treating diabetic foot ulcers. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews(1): Cd010764. 10.1002/14651858.CD010764.pub2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ABS Cat No.1270.0). Available from https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/1270.0.55.005Explanatory%20Notes1July%202016?OpenDocument. Accessed 23 June 2019.