Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 92, Issue 3 , Pages 407-408 , June 2011

Comment on: “Evaluation and comparison of guidelines for the management of people with type 2 diabetes from eight European countries” by Stone et al. on behalf of the GUIDANCE study group (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87(2): 252–60)

Received 17 January 2010 ,Accepted 15 June 2010.

References 

  1. Bobbink IW, Gorter KJ, Rutten GE, Wens J, Claramunt XC, Topsever P, et al. The EUCCLID study: proposed European study on care and complications in people with type 2 diabetes in primary care. Prim Care Diabetes. 2007;1(September (3)):167–171
  2. Chevalier P, De Sutter A, Dirven K, Paulus D, Peremans L, Van Royen P, et al. Algemeen stramien voor de ontwikkeling van aanbevelingen voor goede medische praktijkvoering (Established lines for development of good practice guidelines), Domus Medica. 2007;http://www2.domusmedica.be/files/Stramien_aanbevelingen_2007.pdf[accessed on 16th January 2010]
  3. Michels J, Goossens M, Van Royen P, Philips H, De Sutter A, Van de Vyver N, et al. Het toetsen van aanbevelingen bij huisartsen in Vlaanderen (GPs’ guidelines appraisal in Flanders), Huisarts Nu. 2008;37(9):510–514
  4. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. GRADE working group Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. BMJ. 2004;328:1490
  5. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MA, Addrizzo-Harris D, Hylek EM, Phillips B, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest. 2006;129:174–181

PII: S0168-8227(10)00320-7

doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.06.019

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 92, Issue 3 , Pages 407-408 , June 2011

Article Tools