On what evidence-base do we recommend self-monitoring of blood glucose?☆
Received 3 September 2009; received in revised form 14 October 2009; accepted 22 October 2009. published online 19 November 2009.
Abstract
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered one major breakthrough in diabetes therapy because, for the first time, patients were able to determine their blood glucose levels during daily life. It seems obvious that this must be of advantage to disease management and clinical outcome, but it has become a nightmare for those trying to provide evidence. Randomised controlled trials have yielded inconsistent results on a benefit of SMBG-based treatment strategies not only in type 2 but – surprisingly – also in type 1 and gestational diabetes. Despite this, SMBG is being considered indispensible in intensive insulin treatment, but is being debated for other clinical settings. When considering the non-RCT based reasons for recommending SMBG in type 1 and gestational diabetes it becomes apparent that the same reasons also apply to type 2 diabetes.
☆ Roche Diagnostics provided the basis for a discussion platform for the authors and the colleagues acknowledged, by an unrestricted grant. Hubert Kolb, Kerstin Kempf and Stephan Martin received previous support by Roche Diagnostics, Menarini (H.K.) and Terumo (S.M.).