Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 74, Supplement 2 , Pages S93-S96, December 2006

Pendra goes Dutch; lessons for the CE mark in Europe

  • J.H. DeVries

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address for correspondence: Dr. J.H. DeVries, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 566 6525; Fax: +31 20 566 9158
  • ,
  • I.M.E. Wentholt
  • ,
  • A. Zwart
  • ,
  • J.B. Hoekstra

Academic Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract 

The development of a truly non-invasive continuous glucose sensor is an elusive goal. We describe the rise and fall of the Pendra® device. In 2000 the company Pendragon Medical introduced a truly non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device. This system was based on impedance spectroscopy. Pendra was CE approved in May 2003. For a short time, the Pendra was available on the Dutch direct to consumer market. A post-marketing reliability study was performed in 6 type 1 diabetes patients. Mean Absolute Difference between Pendra glucose values and values obtained through self monitoring of blood glucose was 52%, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was 35.1% and a Clark Error grid showed 4.3% of the Pendra readings in the potentially dangerous zone E. We argue that the CE certification process for continuous glucose sensors should be made more transparent, and that a consensus on specific requirements for continuous glucose sensors is needed, to prevent patients from exposure to potentially dangerous situations. This manuscript is a shortened and adapted version of Wentholt IM, Zwart A, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. Pendra goes Dutch; lessons for the CE mark in Europe. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1055–8 and is published with consent of the editor of Diabetologia.

Keywords:  Glucose sensor , Continuous glucose monitoring , Metabolic control , Artificial pancreas , Impedance spectroscopy , Diabetes

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0168-8227(06)70006-7

doi:10.1016/S0168-8227(06)70006-7

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 74, Supplement 2 , Pages S93-S96, December 2006