Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 65, Issue 2 , Pages 143-149, August 2004

Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among 40,698 Korean metropolitan subjects

  • Won-Young Lee

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul 110746, South Korea
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82-2-2001-2075; fax: +82-2-2001-2049.
  • ,
  • Jeong-Sik Park

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul 110746, South Korea
  • ,
  • Sang-Young Noh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Eun-Jung Rhee

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul 110746, South Korea
  • ,
  • Sun-Woo Kim

      Affiliations

    • Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul 110746, South Korea
  • ,
  • Paul Z Zimmet

      Affiliations

    • International Diabetes Institute, Caulfield, Vic., Australia

Received in revised form 28 November 2003; accepted 12 December 2003.

Abstract 

Introduction: No published study has reported the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Asians using Adults Treatment Panel III (ATP III) criteria, comparing results with that using the obesity criteria of the Asia–Pacific region. Methods: We evaluated the components of the metabolic syndrome among 40,698 participants aged 20–82 years (26,528 men; 14,170 women) who underwent a medical checkup at a University hospital in Seoul during 2001. Results: Using ATP III criteria, the age-adjusted prevalence of the metabolic syndrome for Koreans was 6.8% in total (5.2% male, 9.0% female). Using the Asia–Pacific criteria for abdominal obesity based on waist circumference (APC–WC: ≥90cm in men, ≥80cm in women), prevalence rates were 10.9% (9.8% male, 12.4% female), and by the Asia–Pacific criteria for obesity based on body mass index (BMI) (APC–BMI: ≥25kg/m2 in both sexes), rates were 13.1% (13.2% male, 13.1% female). Using BMI-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for the presence of the metabolic syndrome in those aged over 70 years against those aged 20–29 years was 13.8 (95% CI 8.2–23.2). Using age and BMI-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for the presence of the metabolic syndrome in women versus men was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–1.5). The age-specific prevalence of the metabolic syndrome increased in both male and female participants, and females had higher prevalence rates than males in age groups older than 50 years. The highest prevalence rates were observed by applying APC–BMI criteria. Conclusion: Use of ATP III criteria to define the metabolic syndrome is not appropriate to Asian populations. The CVD risk attached to the use of the Asia–Pacific criteria needs to be determined in different Asian populations.

Keywords:  Metabolic syndrome in Asia, WHO West-Pacific, NCEP ATP III

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0168-8227(04)00018-X

doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2003.12.007

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume 65, Issue 2 , Pages 143-149, August 2004